The Tyler Rationale is put into 4 different questions when considering curriculum for students.
- What educational purposes should the school seek to attain?
- What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these purposes?
- How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
- How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?
When looking back into my own schooling the main thing I can relate back to is the idea of organization. All of my teachers from grade 1 all the way to 12 had a very organized class which follows the above rationale, however, in my opinion makes things dull. As a teacher in training, I have come to the understanding that experiences and learning can’t be controlled and “organized”. Experiences need to be spur of the moment and part of the adventure of learning, but Tyler’s rationale almost puts a limit on those experiences. I can remember being in math class and discovering new things that may not have been in the context of that particular lesson and I remember being told to get back on track with the lesson. Although I wasn’t learning what had been planned for that lesson. I still was learning. But because of the societal norm of this rational, I was pulled away from my own discovery and almost forced into what there organized learning portrayed.
As I stated above with my own experience, the Tyler rationale makes self-discovery next to impossible. Although you can learn and experience new things with these guidelines, it’s in a controlled setting and limits students from discovering things on their own and is more “efficient” as our reading points out. The best learning in my opinion is when you discover it on your own and with your own timeline. The planned/organized experiences may be beneficial for some students but it’s not for everyone. Limiting students learning may follow the curriculum; however it may not be the most beneficial for everyone’s overall learning.
As straight forward as this approach gets, its simplicity is its advantage. It’s a great starting point for teachers and for us who are just starting to teach. This framework makes it easy to familiarize with and easy to adapt to the needs of your own classroom. Although it is quite vague, I think its lack of depth makes teachers have to adopt it into their own variation therefore making learning more beneficial for all students. The knowledge of teaching has advanced exponentially in the past 30 years and although this framework has its ups and downs, I’m sure it will be either updated and or replaced in the future of my career.
After reading kumashiro’s article on common sense, I understood common sense as how teachers overlook the concept of teaching. I have my own opinions on what good teaching looks like, however, someone else’s opinion may be completely different. Our common sense has us to believe that the “American way” as kumashiro stated, or in a general sense, my own way is the best way to teach and live by. I really like this idea because I think as teachers we need to learn to adapt to new teaching methods and to be open to change because although our own methods are effective there is also a lot more to come by. Kumashiro wants us to understand that although what may be easy to us and common sense, we also need to open our horizon on new ways to teach.
In my own life, I would describe common sense when in the context of teaching physical education. Because I am an athlete and skillful in specific events, what comes natural to me is what kumashiro defines as common sense. Whether it may be throwing a ball, or running a lap, because of my advanced knowledge in some skills I may lean more towards teaching those because it comes as commonsense to me. However, we need to curve away from our common sense and teach in ways that may not be as easy. I struggle with units like dance, and gymnastics, but some students may learn more when in the context of those 2 elements. I myself need to work on getting out of my comfort zone and venturing away from what I call common sense, to increase my teaching ability for all.
Throughout this semester I had the opportunity to mentor 4 developing EDTC 300 students. With my busy schedule and procrastinated mind set I found it hard to keep up with commenting on all 4 blogs, however I managed to survive it all. I thought it was a good way to give back to these students because I remember being in there shoes in the class that use to be called ECMP 355. Mentoring not only had me help them with their blogs and overall thinking, but also gave me a new incite on certain topics in the realm of technology and their own learning projects. This mentoring process’s intent was for me to help these new students learn in the terms of blogging and technology; however I think that I did the most learning while reaching out to each of them. I learned a lot from them, whether it was in the term of their learning projects (learning ASL, and ketogenic diet), or there insightful post about technology I think I learned a lot from them and hope that my comments helped them out and gave them insight on what they could do better. Here is the proof of my commenting of all 4 the students I mentored and feel free to follow each and one of them to see their growth as they become future educators.
With regards to whether or not I could teach a class like this in the future, I would probably decline. This is only due to my lack of technology skills and liking and if I took more classes to advance my knowledge even more I think my answer would possibly change. However, with my knowledge on technology as it sits right now, I don’t think I could manage planning and setting up a class in this framework of being online.
Even with my lack of technological skills, I can’t deny my growth of technology in the terms of teaching. I believe I have the knowledge to use technology properly and safely in the class due to this semesters work. I have learned of so many new tools to use like google classroom, flip grid, and even google docs and I think I will incorporate this learning into my future career. I also had my ECS 200 placement this semester and my co-op teacher was pro-technology so I got to use the knowledge i learned in the actual classroom. In conclusion I do believe I will use my knowledge of technology in my future classroom, and I hope to further educate myself in this topic as the decades advance.
Best of luck to all 4 of my mentored students and also to all my EDTC 400 peers. As i grow in the future i am sure you all will too, and i hope to chat with all of you in the future.
Here is my representation of our summary of learning project, hope you guys enjoy!
the day had finally come, the time for where my constant arguing would pay off… the day of the debate. I was quite happy with my debate topic because I truly didn’t agree with either side and thought that I could argue for both, so once I found out I had to disagree with the topic of “We have become too dependent on technology and what we really need is to unplug” I was ready for the challenge. I was quite worried about the debate and also my lesson because I was in Montreal for Nationals and the WiFi at my hotel was quite unstable. however, the WiFi managed to pull through and both went swimmingly (that’s a pun because I am in Montreal for swimming nationals).
With the debate up for discussion, I thought it was a good fight. Morgan provided some well pointed out facts about how we do indeed rely on technology and how it disconnects us from society and also relationships. I fought hard to contradict those key points and I do believe I kept my ground in that regard. although I found a video that I found interesting on how relationships are affected due to technology which would have helped Morgans case. This video talks about whether if we want relationships or not, we hide from them (technology in this case) and although we truly may not want them, we, in fact, do need them.
“see, the challenge is we all want to be with somebody who makes us happy. when what we need is to be someone who makes us happy”
this statement contradicts the idea of how we need relationships in our life, however, he goes on to say that
“because the problem with our generation not wanting relationships is that, at the end of the day… they do”
both quotes really struck my attention because although they contradict one another it perfectly fits this debate topic. my side falls under how we need to be the happiness in our lives and be the change. whether it’s cutting all technology whatsoever or just limiting it, my argument relied on how it’s our own personal choice. however, the second statement falls under Morgans side of how we need to have relationships in our lives and whether or not technology is influencing them we still need them present in society. I think this video is a great representation of how influential technology is in our lives and whether its positive, negative or both it’s up to you to decide.
Being a 90s kid you can imagine the drastic change I went through in my childhood when in the midst of technology. Starting from Disney movies on VHS all the way to smart phones and smartboards in high school, and one can agree the severe change my generation went through. However, when in the debate topic of; if Social media is ruining childhood; I find myself in a deadlock. I can’t deny that I use social media and although I know of its harm I think it’s also a great way for me to keep connected to family and friends. However, it didn’t ruin my childhood in any way. Although it didn’t ruin my own childhood, in today’s generation it may be a little more severe because of the easy access to technology. This is the reason why they have such a pronoun digital identity at such a young age, and such depression due to online social contexts. This exposes them to social media at such a young age that they become overexposed and at times addicted. This may be why people think it is ruining childhood in today’s generation but I don’t exactly agree with its reasoning due to my own experience.
We can’t deny the facts that “71% of children now have access to a tablet computer at home” or how” Cyberbullying has affected more than 1 in 5 children aged 10-12 years”. These facts are concerning and make us wonder if social media is in fact ruining our kids childhood. However, I do believe there is ways to overcome these shocking facts and still have social media present in society. I think the first way to overcome these realities is for us as teachers to teach for digital citizenship. As long as kids understand the reality of social media and how to safely use it, I believe social media can be a part of our society. I also think it revolves around the guidance of a parent/guardian.in my own experience for example, I wasn’t allowed to have Facebook until I was older and more mature. However, once I got Facebook in grade 7 I had restrictions to my online use. As long as my parents could see me when I was on it and also limit my use of it they were willing to let me have it. I think that guidance helped me become more responsible with social media and also kept me from becoming dependent on it. so one can see how with the proper use of technology one can avoid it from becoming harmful towards you and can benefit from its use.
Both sides to this argument have valid points and as I said above I am in a deadlock. Both debaters did a wonderful job stating their opinion and although I answered with the disagreement side online, it was only because I couldn’t choose neutral.
Technology is a force for equity in society. Agree or disagree?
When first reading this debate title I originally agreed with its meaning however once the debate happened in the class I personally started to second guess myself. I have always connected with how technology helps us in an educational stance and I figured it was an equitable source for our students. Nevertheless, I never put into the consideration the context of poverty. Whether technology benefits students learning is irrelevant if you can’t manage to get it in the first place. This realization was Doug’s main argument and was the reason I second guessed my original judgment and leaned more to the disagree side of the argument. Although I disagree with this topic we can also look at the arguments for why you may agree with it. The main reason I took from this side was how we can see how technology can benefit students in a general sense when in context of their overall learning. Most kids nowadays use the internet for homework purposes and with all the online sources that are out there, it’s no doubt why it helps them learn a topic easier. In a general sense technology makes learning easier and if used properly in the class will promote a deeper understanding of learning. However, because of its main role in society, it will also connect better with students overall engagement of the lesson due to the use of technology in one’s class.
What tipped me over to the other side was the idea of how not every place has access to technology. Whether it may be somewhere up north where the internet connection is limited or even looking into low-income families who may be under the poverty level and simply can’t get any technology because it’s not in there budget. You can’t possibly make technology equitable if these situations can’t even use it at all. The article on the two different cities with the exact same library opportunity also shocked me once I learned that even if these low-income families are provided with the technology does not mean it will help them in any way. It discussed how the already advantaged students gained more because of the student-parent interaction that led them to be on task. However, technology on a low-income city student had no effect on them because they either couldn’t use them (lack of experience) or just fooled around on them due to lack of supervision. It was a crazy realization of how even if all kids were on the same playing field when in context of technology doesn’t make it equitable in any way. This article is definitely a good read and I would definitely recommend it to anyone wanting to learn more about this issue and can locate it here.
I applaud both debaters for their wonderful job. Although Doug did lead me in the direction of disagreeing with the topic I think both sides were well presented and thought through. I think both sides have valid arguments and I hope to hear your guy’s opinion on the matter. Comment below what you think